“The state has a mas sive inter est in the well be ing of the fam ily unit because it forms the basic build ing block for soci ety. I would argue that this is a suf fi cient basis for legally defin ing mar riage, since mar riage (and “after the fact” mar riage) is the basis for the fa18my.&#i22l;I agree with the first statement, and I agree with the idea that stable heterosexual relationships are the basis for family. Which is actually what I’ve advocated in the post. That the state has a role to play in incentivising heterosexual relationships with economic benefits.

I’m really enjoying the theme/design of your site. Do you ever run into any browser coaptmibility problems? A few of my blog visitors have complained about my website not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari. Do you have any suggestions to help fix this issue?

Sue the federal government for damages due to not enforcing immigration laws currently on the books….throw ’em in prison attorneys.

The story was in the Washington Times Dec. 2, 2015 by Stephen Dinan, headlined “ICE Gives Away $113 million, Says Not Enough Illegal Aliens To Deport”.

They have the money, they just refuse to follow the law.

But more importantly, what does that have to do with whether he is following the law? They are arguing social policy, vs. whether the law of the land should be and is being enforced, as the constitution states it is the president’s duty to do. A couple of the liberal judges asked questions about whether Congress should vote more money to deport illegals, and if they don’t do so, doesn’t that give illegals the right to stay, and even further, have the right to work even though federal law says they can’t legally work.

Again, this is arguing social policy, not whether the president can just ignore laws he doesn’t like. If the law says you must be legally present here to work, his waving a magic wand and declaring whole classes of people as legal and giving them work permits is simply compounding one illegal action on another.

And as far as more money to deport people, didn’t this administration return many millions of dollars in the last budget year as “unneeded” because the numbers of people they are actually deporting is way down? It’s nothing to do with money, they simply won’t return anyone unless they commit a major crime, and even then it’s iffy.